2024-12-26 Mystery meeting

https://gyazo.com/224c907134bb82ca0697daf80aee0a46

The proliferation of radical opinions generates an outpouring of opposing views.

Some people see that and join in the "justice" thinking that since everyone else is beating them up, it's okay for them to do it too.

The desire to beat others with the cudgel of justice

These people will be the next "radical" or "crazy" opinion.

https://gyazo.com/bd3c294bd0ef97f2cb44a692344f8fad

Moderates are simply arguing against a radical opinion, but by making false abstractions with attribution, they create the mistaken impression that they are fighting two sides of the same coin.

When I talk about the need for a means of mass communication with a certain attribute X, people who only imagine mass communication in terms of SNS tend to imagine putting that attribute X into the SNS we have now, but that is not necessary.

The current social networking sites are used by customers who prefer the current social networking sites, so there is no need to fight with them.

Pick up unmet needs and unmet customers on that social networking site.

Is Twitter an appropriate means of gathering public opinion for government?

In situations where your opinion is seen by your followers, you are aware of "how your followers see you".

Some people try to "make good suggestions" by doing so, while others, on the contrary, try to beat the government to be appreciated.

There is a community by the latter people

Propaganda-filled social networking sites

How do we know the truth?

prediction market

Can we do long-term planning in a democracy?

Can authoritarianism do it?

Cars in India

natural state

Can be maintained even if electricity is lost.

American Technology

trickle down

---